| Title |
Considerations for artificial intelligence clinical impact in oncologic imaging: an AI4HI position paper
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Insights into Imaging, May 2022
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s13244-022-01220-9 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Luis Marti-Bonmati, Dow-Mu Koh, Katrine Riklund, Maciej Bobowicz, Yiannis Roussakis, Joan C. Vilanova, Jurgen J. Fütterer, Jordi Rimola, Pedro Mallol, Gloria Ribas, Ana Miguel, Manolis Tsiknakis, Karim Lekadir, Gianna Tsakou |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 16 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Spain | 2 | 13% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 6% |
| Netherlands | 1 | 6% |
| Germany | 1 | 6% |
| Austria | 1 | 6% |
| United States | 1 | 6% |
| India | 1 | 6% |
| Unknown | 8 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 11 | 69% |
| Scientists | 3 | 19% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 2 | 13% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 41 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 41 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Librarian | 6 | 15% |
| Researcher | 5 | 12% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 4 | 10% |
| Professor > Associate Professor | 2 | 5% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 1 | 2% |
| Other | 2 | 5% |
| Unknown | 21 | 51% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Nursing and Health Professions | 5 | 12% |
| Engineering | 5 | 12% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 5 | 12% |
| Computer Science | 2 | 5% |
| Social Sciences | 2 | 5% |
| Other | 1 | 2% |
| Unknown | 21 | 51% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 12. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 October 2022.
All research outputs
#3,087,567
of 25,381,151 outputs
Outputs from Insights into Imaging
#167
of 1,226 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#65,605
of 436,314 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Insights into Imaging
#5
of 38 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,381,151 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 87th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,226 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.0. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 436,314 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 38 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its contemporaries.