↓ Skip to main content

Feasibility study on calculating the Q value of shallow media by using a dense seismic array and a large-volume airgun source

Overview of attention for article published in Earth, Planets and Space, May 2022
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (58th percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
6 X users

Readers on

mendeley
5 Mendeley
Title
Feasibility study on calculating the Q value of shallow media by using a dense seismic array and a large-volume airgun source
Published in
Earth, Planets and Space, May 2022
DOI 10.1186/s40623-022-01625-2
Authors

Shen Du, YanXiang Yu, Liang Xiao

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 6 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 5 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 5 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 2 40%
Lecturer 1 20%
Unknown 2 40%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Environmental Science 1 20%
Psychology 1 20%
Decision Sciences 1 20%
Unknown 2 40%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 May 2022.
All research outputs
#14,479,560
of 25,516,314 outputs
Outputs from Earth, Planets and Space
#673
of 1,481 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#183,039
of 446,245 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Earth, Planets and Space
#25
of 53 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,516,314 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,481 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.9. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 52% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 446,245 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 58% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 53 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 47th percentile – i.e., 47% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.