↓ Skip to main content

Erratum to: A new species of Pomacentrus (Actinopterygii: Pomacentridae) from Micronesia, with comments on its phylogenetic relationship

Overview of attention for article published in Zoological Studies, September 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#32 of 134)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (63rd percentile)

Mentioned by

wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Readers on

mendeley
1 Mendeley
Title
Erratum to: A new species of Pomacentrus (Actinopterygii: Pomacentridae) from Micronesia, with comments on its phylogenetic relationship
Published in
Zoological Studies, September 2014
DOI 10.1186/s40555-014-0046-y
Authors

Shang-Yin Vanson Liu, Hsuan-Ching Hans Ho, Chang-Feng Dai

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 1 Mendeley reader of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 1 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Other 1 100%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 100%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 November 2021.
All research outputs
#6,887,501
of 21,252,842 outputs
Outputs from Zoological Studies
#32
of 134 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#84,289
of 235,491 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Zoological Studies
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 21,252,842 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 134 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.5. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 50% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 235,491 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 63% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them