↓ Skip to main content

Mending a broken heart with novel cardiogenic small molecules

Overview of attention for article published in Cell Regeneration, May 2022
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (55th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (54th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
4 X users

Readers on

mendeley
6 Mendeley
Title
Mending a broken heart with novel cardiogenic small molecules
Published in
Cell Regeneration, May 2022
DOI 10.1186/s13619-022-00120-z
Pubmed ID
Authors

Nevan Powers, Guo N. Huang

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 6 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 6 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Unspecified 1 17%
Researcher 1 17%
Other 1 17%
Student > Doctoral Student 1 17%
Unknown 2 33%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 2 33%
Unspecified 1 17%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 17%
Unknown 2 33%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 May 2022.
All research outputs
#13,750,494
of 23,312,088 outputs
Outputs from Cell Regeneration
#56
of 159 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#190,041
of 442,988 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cell Regeneration
#5
of 11 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,312,088 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 39th percentile – i.e., 39% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 159 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.8. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 62% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 442,988 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 55% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 11 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 54% of its contemporaries.