↓ Skip to main content

A literature review and integrated framework for the determinants of crowdfunding success

Overview of attention for article published in Financial Innovation, May 2022
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
31 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
138 Mendeley
Title
A literature review and integrated framework for the determinants of crowdfunding success
Published in
Financial Innovation, May 2022
DOI 10.1186/s40854-022-00345-6
Authors

Lingfei Deng, Qiang Ye, DaPeng Xu, Wenjun Sun, Guangxin Jiang

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 138 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 138 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Lecturer 13 9%
Student > Ph. D. Student 10 7%
Unspecified 7 5%
Student > Bachelor 7 5%
Student > Master 6 4%
Other 17 12%
Unknown 78 57%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Business, Management and Accounting 29 21%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 11 8%
Unspecified 7 5%
Engineering 2 1%
Social Sciences 2 1%
Other 4 3%
Unknown 83 60%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 May 2022.
All research outputs
#18,810,584
of 23,312,088 outputs
Outputs from Financial Innovation
#139
of 164 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#317,103
of 442,486 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Financial Innovation
#10
of 11 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,312,088 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 164 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.2. This one is in the 7th percentile – i.e., 7% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 442,486 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 18th percentile – i.e., 18% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 11 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 9th percentile – i.e., 9% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.