↓ Skip to main content

The EORTC QLU-C10D discrete choice experiment for cancer patients: a first step towards patient utility weights

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Patient-Reported Outcomes, May 2022
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age

Mentioned by

twitter
2 tweeters

Readers on

mendeley
2 Mendeley
Title
The EORTC QLU-C10D discrete choice experiment for cancer patients: a first step towards patient utility weights
Published in
Journal of Patient-Reported Outcomes, May 2022
DOI 10.1186/s41687-022-00430-5
Pubmed ID
Authors

Eva-Maria Gamper, Madeleine T. King, Richard Norman, Fanny L. C. Loth, Bernhard Holzner, Georg Kemmler

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 2 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 2 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Unknown 2 100%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Unknown 2 100%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 July 2022.
All research outputs
#15,384,302
of 22,888,307 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Patient-Reported Outcomes
#300
of 497 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#247,908
of 439,724 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Patient-Reported Outcomes
#32
of 45 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,888,307 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 497 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.7. This one is in the 29th percentile – i.e., 29% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 439,724 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 45 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.