| Title |
Cost-effectiveness of CTA, MRA and DSA in patients with non-traumatic subarachnoid haemorrhage
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Insights into Imaging, July 2013
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s13244-013-0264-6 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Anna M. H. Sailer, Janneke P. Grutters, Joachim E. Wildberger, Paul A. Hofman, Jan T. Wilmink, Willem H. van Zwam |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 45 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Korea, Republic of | 1 | 2% |
| Unknown | 44 | 98% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 7 | 16% |
| Student > Bachelor | 6 | 13% |
| Student > Master | 6 | 13% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 5 | 11% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 5 | 11% |
| Other | 6 | 13% |
| Unknown | 10 | 22% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 21 | 47% |
| Neuroscience | 4 | 9% |
| Engineering | 3 | 7% |
| Physics and Astronomy | 2 | 4% |
| Computer Science | 2 | 4% |
| Other | 1 | 2% |
| Unknown | 12 | 27% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 September 2022.
All research outputs
#5,117,194
of 24,217,893 outputs
Outputs from Insights into Imaging
#322
of 1,072 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#41,726
of 198,257 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Insights into Imaging
#2
of 13 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,217,893 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 75th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,072 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.2. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 69% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 198,257 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 13 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its contemporaries.