↓ Skip to main content

Review of “CiteSpace: A Practical Guide For Mapping Scientific Literature” by Chaomei Chen

Overview of attention for article published in Complex Adaptive Systems Modeling, October 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (63rd percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page
googleplus
1 Google+ user

Citations

dimensions_citation
11 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
32 Mendeley
Title
Review of “CiteSpace: A Practical Guide For Mapping Scientific Literature” by Chaomei Chen
Published in
Complex Adaptive Systems Modeling, October 2016
DOI 10.1186/s40294-016-0036-5
Authors

Muaz A. Niazi

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 32 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 32 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Other 6 19%
Student > Master 6 19%
Researcher 4 13%
Student > Ph. D. Student 3 9%
Student > Bachelor 1 3%
Other 6 19%
Unknown 6 19%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Social Sciences 6 19%
Environmental Science 4 13%
Business, Management and Accounting 3 9%
Engineering 3 9%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 6%
Other 6 19%
Unknown 8 25%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 October 2016.
All research outputs
#7,433,164
of 22,893,031 outputs
Outputs from Complex Adaptive Systems Modeling
#35
of 79 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#113,472
of 316,298 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Complex Adaptive Systems Modeling
#3
of 5 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,893,031 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 67th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 79 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.4. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 54% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 316,298 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 63% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 5 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 2 of them.