↓ Skip to main content

A review of silicon microfabricated ion traps for quantum information processing

Overview of attention for article published in Micro and Nano Systems Letters, April 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (55th percentile)

Mentioned by

patent
2 patents

Citations

dimensions_citation
24 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
66 Mendeley
Title
A review of silicon microfabricated ion traps for quantum information processing
Published in
Micro and Nano Systems Letters, April 2015
DOI 10.1186/s40486-015-0013-3
Authors

Dong-Il “Dan” Cho, Seokjun Hong, Minjae Lee, Taehyun Kim

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 66 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Germany 1 2%
Unknown 65 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 19 29%
Researcher 14 21%
Student > Postgraduate 4 6%
Student > Master 4 6%
Student > Bachelor 3 5%
Other 9 14%
Unknown 13 20%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Physics and Astronomy 35 53%
Engineering 8 12%
Computer Science 3 5%
Unspecified 2 3%
Chemistry 2 3%
Other 3 5%
Unknown 13 20%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 25 January 2023.
All research outputs
#7,630,234
of 23,253,955 outputs
Outputs from Micro and Nano Systems Letters
#6
of 37 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#91,852
of 266,276 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Micro and Nano Systems Letters
#1
of 3 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,253,955 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 37 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.1. This one scored the same or higher as 31 of them.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 266,276 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 55% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 3 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them