↓ Skip to main content

Sequence analysis and protein interactions of Arabidopsis CIA2 and CIL proteins

Overview of attention for article published in Botanical Studies, June 2020
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (53rd percentile)

Mentioned by

patent
2 patents

Citations

dimensions_citation
4 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
13 Mendeley
Title
Sequence analysis and protein interactions of Arabidopsis CIA2 and CIL proteins
Published in
Botanical Studies, June 2020
DOI 10.1186/s40529-020-00297-z
Pubmed ID
Authors

Chun-Yen Yang, Chih-Wen Sun

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 13 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 13 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 2 15%
Researcher 1 8%
Unknown 10 77%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 8%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 8%
Chemistry 1 8%
Unknown 10 77%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 November 2019.
All research outputs
#8,540,769
of 25,387,668 outputs
Outputs from Botanical Studies
#51
of 188 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#183,081
of 434,015 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Botanical Studies
#3
of 4 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,387,668 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 188 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.5. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 67% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 434,015 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 53% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 4 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.