↓ Skip to main content

Production of HlyA and ClyA haemolysins among quinolone-resistant Escherichia coli isolated from clinical samples

Overview of attention for article published in SpringerPlus, February 2013
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
1 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
5 Mendeley
Title
Production of HlyA and ClyA haemolysins among quinolone-resistant Escherichia coli isolated from clinical samples
Published in
SpringerPlus, February 2013
DOI 10.1186/2193-1801-2-71
Pubmed ID
Authors

Alicia Márquez-López, Belén Ruiz del Castillo, María Eliecer Cano, Cristina Rodríguez-Mirones, Jesús Oteo, David Sáez, Luis Martínez-Martínez

Abstract

Most Escherichia coli resistant to quinolones are not haemolytic. The objective of this study was to determine the phylogroup, clonal relationship, mechanism of quinolone resistance and virulence factors in 70 haemolytic E. coli resistant to nalidixic acid. Sixty-six isolates contained the hlyA gene, belonged to phylogroup B2, and 61 of them presented low-level resistance to fluoroquinolones. Four isolates presented high-level resistance to fluoroquinolones, contained the clyA gene and were included in phylogroup D. One single isolate (phylogroup D, with low level resistance to fluoroquinolones) contained both cytotoxins.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 5 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 5 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Doctoral Student 3 60%
Other 1 20%
Student > Ph. D. Student 1 20%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 40%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 20%
Immunology and Microbiology 1 20%
Medicine and Dentistry 1 20%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 February 2013.
All research outputs
#20,184,694
of 22,699,621 outputs
Outputs from SpringerPlus
#1,461
of 1,852 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#169,542
of 192,966 outputs
Outputs of similar age from SpringerPlus
#59
of 113 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,699,621 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,852 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.7. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 192,966 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 113 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.