| Title |
Degenerative lumbar scoliosis: features and surgical treatment
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Journal of Orthopaedics and Traumatology, June 2006
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s10195-006-0123-z |
| Authors |
C. Faldini, S. Pagkrati, G. Grandi, V. Digennaro, O. Faldini, S. Giannini |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 20 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 20 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Postgraduate | 6 | 30% |
| Researcher | 5 | 25% |
| Student > Master | 2 | 10% |
| Student > Bachelor | 2 | 10% |
| Professor | 1 | 5% |
| Other | 1 | 5% |
| Unknown | 3 | 15% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 15 | 75% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 1 | 5% |
| Engineering | 1 | 5% |
| Unknown | 3 | 15% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 March 2010.
All research outputs
#7,866,480
of 23,849,058 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Orthopaedics and Traumatology
#60
of 222 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#23,177
of 65,153 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Orthopaedics and Traumatology
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,849,058 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 222 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.0. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 58% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 65,153 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 15th percentile – i.e., 15% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them