↓ Skip to main content

EAPS Congress 2016

Overview of attention for article published in European Journal of Pediatrics, October 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (58th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (64th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
4 tweeters

Citations

dimensions_citation
5 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
187 Mendeley
Title
EAPS Congress 2016
Published in
European Journal of Pediatrics, October 2016
DOI 10.1007/s00431-016-2785-8
Pubmed ID

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 187 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Unknown 186 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 36 19%
Student > Bachelor 32 17%
Unspecified 28 15%
Student > Ph. D. Student 24 13%
Researcher 20 11%
Other 47 25%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 57 30%
Nursing and Health Professions 35 19%
Unspecified 33 18%
Psychology 14 7%
Computer Science 11 6%
Other 37 20%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 August 2017.
All research outputs
#6,467,468
of 12,220,965 outputs
Outputs from European Journal of Pediatrics
#1,201
of 2,136 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#106,980
of 261,759 outputs
Outputs of similar age from European Journal of Pediatrics
#19
of 51 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 12,220,965 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 46th percentile – i.e., 46% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,136 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.9. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 261,759 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 58% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 51 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 64% of its contemporaries.