| Title |
Do Evidence-Based Interventions Work When Tested in the “Real World?” A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Parent Management Training for the Treatment of Child Disruptive Behavior
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Clinical Child and Family Psychology Review, February 2013
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s10567-013-0128-0 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Daniel Michelson, Clare Davenport, Janine Dretzke, Jane Barlow, Crispin Day |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 11 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 4 | 36% |
| Portugal | 1 | 9% |
| Australia | 1 | 9% |
| Sweden | 1 | 9% |
| Unknown | 4 | 36% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Scientists | 5 | 45% |
| Members of the public | 5 | 45% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 9% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 239 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 1 | <1% |
| United States | 1 | <1% |
| Switzerland | 1 | <1% |
| Australia | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 235 | 98% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 37 | 15% |
| Researcher | 34 | 14% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 29 | 12% |
| Student > Bachelor | 29 | 12% |
| Student > Master | 28 | 12% |
| Other | 38 | 16% |
| Unknown | 44 | 18% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Psychology | 105 | 44% |
| Social Sciences | 30 | 13% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 17 | 7% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 6 | 3% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 4 | 2% |
| Other | 15 | 6% |
| Unknown | 62 | 26% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 14. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 May 2022.
All research outputs
#2,613,660
of 25,882,826 outputs
Outputs from Clinical Child and Family Psychology Review
#109
of 408 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#20,493
of 205,726 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Clinical Child and Family Psychology Review
#1
of 3 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,882,826 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 89th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 408 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 19.4. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 205,726 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 3 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them