↓ Skip to main content

An electronic patient-reported outcome created based on my needs is worth using: an explorative qualitative study investigating young people’s opinions for a health assessment tool

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Patient-Reported Outcomes, March 2022
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (58th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (80th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
4 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
3 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
32 Mendeley
Title
An electronic patient-reported outcome created based on my needs is worth using: an explorative qualitative study investigating young people’s opinions for a health assessment tool
Published in
Journal of Patient-Reported Outcomes, March 2022
DOI 10.1186/s41687-022-00436-z
Pubmed ID
Authors

Petra V. Lostelius, Magdalena Mattebo, Anne Söderlund, Åsa Revenäs, Eva Thors Adolfsson

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 32 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 32 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 3 9%
Researcher 2 6%
Student > Doctoral Student 2 6%
Librarian 1 3%
Professor 1 3%
Other 1 3%
Unknown 22 69%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 3 9%
Nursing and Health Professions 2 6%
Psychology 2 6%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 1 3%
Computer Science 1 3%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 23 72%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 April 2022.
All research outputs
#14,521,560
of 25,758,211 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Patient-Reported Outcomes
#202
of 679 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#183,008
of 448,133 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Patient-Reported Outcomes
#7
of 35 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,758,211 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 679 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.2. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 69% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 448,133 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 58% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 35 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its contemporaries.