↓ Skip to main content

A Descriptive Study of Hot Aches: a Previously Unreported Winter Climbing Phenomenon

Overview of attention for article published in Sports Medicine - Open, September 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (91st percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (71st percentile)

Mentioned by

news
2 news outlets
twitter
9 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
1 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
10 Mendeley
Title
A Descriptive Study of Hot Aches: a Previously Unreported Winter Climbing Phenomenon
Published in
Sports Medicine - Open, September 2016
DOI 10.1186/s40798-016-0062-z
Pubmed ID
Authors

Andrew Melvin, Jacob George

Abstract

Hot aches, also known as the screaming barfies in North America, are a recognised phenomenon amongst winter climbers, assumed to be triggered by the reperfusion of cold peripheries which then rapidly progresses to a systemic vasodilatory syndrome. Symptoms experienced in the hands include pain, numbness and throbbing followed by systemic symptoms such as nausea, irritability, dizziness and in extreme cases a transient loss of vision and hearing. Despite being well known amongst the winter climbing community, there are no publications in the scientific literature characterising the hot aches. A survey was posted online at http://www.ukclimbing.com between the dates of 28th September 2014 to 1st December 2014. Data was collected and analysed offline using Microsoft excel. This is a descriptive epidemiological study of UK winter climbers and their experience of hot aches. We found that hot aches are experienced by 96 % of these climbers. They generally last 1-5 min, and 75 % rate them as being 3-4 (out of 5) on a pain scale. The most common local symptoms are pain (87 %), throbbing (70 %) and tingling (52 %). The most common systemic symptoms are nausea (44 %), irritability (32 %) and dizziness (20 %). Twenty percent of climbers experience hot aches in locations other than their hands. The hot aches are a highly predictable and consistent experience for almost all winter climbers. This study has characterised, for the first time, a recognised but previously unreported phenomenon that occurs in extreme winter climbers. The short- and long-term consequences are currently unknown and warrant further investigation.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 9 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 10 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 10 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Other 3 30%
Student > Postgraduate 2 20%
Student > Bachelor 2 20%
Lecturer > Senior Lecturer 1 10%
Student > Master 1 10%
Other 1 10%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 2 20%
Arts and Humanities 1 10%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 1 10%
Nursing and Health Professions 1 10%
Social Sciences 1 10%
Other 1 10%
Unknown 3 30%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 24. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 December 2016.
All research outputs
#1,562,562
of 25,374,917 outputs
Outputs from Sports Medicine - Open
#146
of 595 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#27,213
of 331,246 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Sports Medicine - Open
#4
of 14 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,917 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 93rd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 595 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 26.6. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 331,246 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 14 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 71% of its contemporaries.