| Title |
Change is permanent: thoughts on the fading of cochineal-based watercolor pigments
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Heritage Science, July 2017
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s40494-017-0143-4 |
| Authors |
Barbara H. Berrie, Yoonjoo Strumfels |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 50 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 50 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 11 | 22% |
| Researcher | 9 | 18% |
| Student > Bachelor | 5 | 10% |
| Student > Master | 4 | 8% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 3 | 6% |
| Other | 7 | 14% |
| Unknown | 11 | 22% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Chemistry | 11 | 22% |
| Arts and Humanities | 9 | 18% |
| Materials Science | 4 | 8% |
| Chemical Engineering | 3 | 6% |
| Engineering | 3 | 6% |
| Other | 6 | 12% |
| Unknown | 14 | 28% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 March 2022.
All research outputs
#7,708,493
of 23,443,716 outputs
Outputs from Heritage Science
#217
of 432 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#121,412
of 317,957 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Heritage Science
#5
of 12 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,443,716 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 432 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.6. This one is in the 45th percentile – i.e., 45% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 317,957 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 54% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 12 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 58% of its contemporaries.