| Title |
Growth-Form Responses to Fire in Nama-Karoo Escarpment Grassland, South Africa
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Fire Ecology, December 2017
|
| DOI | 10.4996/fireecology.130308594 |
| Authors |
Tineke Kraaij, Cyanne Young, Hugo Bezuidenhout |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 33 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 33 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 6 | 18% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 4 | 12% |
| Researcher | 4 | 12% |
| Lecturer | 2 | 6% |
| Student > Bachelor | 2 | 6% |
| Other | 3 | 9% |
| Unknown | 12 | 36% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Environmental Science | 12 | 36% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 6 | 18% |
| Computer Science | 1 | 3% |
| Earth and Planetary Sciences | 1 | 3% |
| Unknown | 13 | 39% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 41. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 March 2022.
All research outputs
#876,379
of 23,426,104 outputs
Outputs from Fire Ecology
#17
of 193 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#21,504
of 440,101 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Fire Ecology
#1
of 4 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,426,104 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 96th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 193 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.9. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 440,101 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 4 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them