↓ Skip to main content

Integrative medicine and human health ‐ the role of pre‐, pro‐ and synbiotics

Overview of attention for article published in Clinical and Translational Medicine, May 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age

Mentioned by

twitter
3 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
11 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
100 Mendeley
Title
Integrative medicine and human health ‐ the role of pre‐, pro‐ and synbiotics
Published in
Clinical and Translational Medicine, May 2012
DOI 10.1186/2001-1326-1-6
Pubmed ID
Authors

Stig Bengmark

Abstract

Western lifestyle is associated with a sustained low grade increase in inflammation -increased levels of endotoxin in the body and increased activation of Toll-like receptors and neutrophils, which leads to impaired immunity and reduced resistance to disease, changes which might explain the epidemic of chronic diseases spreading around the globe. The immune system cannot function properly without access to bacteria and raw plants, rich not only in bacteria but also in plant fibre, antioxidants, healthy fats and numerous other nutrients. Modern food technology with plant breeding, separation, condensation of food ingredients, heating, freezing, drying, irradiation, microwaving, are effective tool to counteract optimal immune function, and suspected to be a leading cause of so called Western diseases. Supply of pre-, pro-, and synbiotics have sometimes proved to be effective tools to counteract, especially acute diseases, but have often failed, especially in chronic diseases. Thousands of factors contribute to unhealth and numerous alterations in life style and food habits are often needed, in order to prevent and cure "treatment-resistant" chronic diseases. Such alterations include avoiding processed foods rich in pro-inflammatory molecules, but also a focus on consuming substantial amounts of foods with documented anti-inflammatory effects, often raw and fresh green vegetables and tubers such as turmeric/curcumin.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 100 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Chile 1 1%
Netherlands 1 1%
Slovenia 1 1%
Brazil 1 1%
Unknown 96 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 19 19%
Student > Master 14 14%
Student > Ph. D. Student 12 12%
Other 8 8%
Researcher 6 6%
Other 21 21%
Unknown 20 20%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 33 33%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 21 21%
Nursing and Health Professions 7 7%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 6 6%
Social Sciences 2 2%
Other 7 7%
Unknown 24 24%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 March 2015.
All research outputs
#16,048,009
of 25,374,647 outputs
Outputs from Clinical and Translational Medicine
#491
of 1,060 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#108,704
of 178,786 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Clinical and Translational Medicine
#3
of 4 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,647 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 34th percentile – i.e., 34% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,060 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.2. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 50% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 178,786 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 37th percentile – i.e., 37% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 4 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.