↓ Skip to main content

How do patients and physicians perceive immune thrombocytopenia (ITP) as a disease? Results from Indian analysis of ITP World Impact Survey (I-WISh)

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Patient-Reported Outcomes, March 2022
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 tweeter

Citations

dimensions_citation
3 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
13 Mendeley
Title
How do patients and physicians perceive immune thrombocytopenia (ITP) as a disease? Results from Indian analysis of ITP World Impact Survey (I-WISh)
Published in
Journal of Patient-Reported Outcomes, March 2022
DOI 10.1186/s41687-022-00429-y
Authors

Prantar Chakrabarti, Biju George, Chandrakala Shanmukhaiah, Lalit Mohan Sharma, Shashank Udupi, Waleed Ghanima

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 tweeter who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 13 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 13 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Unspecified 3 23%
Student > Master 2 15%
Student > Ph. D. Student 1 8%
Professor 1 8%
Unknown 6 46%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Unspecified 3 23%
Medicine and Dentistry 2 15%
Sports and Recreations 1 8%
Nursing and Health Professions 1 8%
Unknown 6 46%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 March 2022.
All research outputs
#17,810,518
of 22,029,478 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Patient-Reported Outcomes
#374
of 462 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#289,052
of 392,958 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Patient-Reported Outcomes
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,029,478 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 462 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.7. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 392,958 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 16th percentile – i.e., 16% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them