↓ Skip to main content

Platelet rich plasma injection grafts for musculoskeletal injuries: a review

Overview of attention for article published in Current Reviews in Musculoskeletal Medicine, July 2008
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#37 of 539)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (97th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (60th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
blogs
1 blog
twitter
9 X users
patent
5 patents
facebook
2 Facebook pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
443 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
416 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
Title
Platelet rich plasma injection grafts for musculoskeletal injuries: a review
Published in
Current Reviews in Musculoskeletal Medicine, July 2008
DOI 10.1007/s12178-008-9032-5
Pubmed ID
Authors

Steven Sampson, Michael Gerhardt, Bert Mandelbaum

Abstract

In Europe and the United States, there is an increasing prevalence of the use of autologous blood products to facilitate healing in a variety of applications. Recently, we have learned more about specific growth factors, which play a crucial role in the healing process. With that knowledge there is abundant enthusiasm in the application of concentrated platelets, which release a supra-maximal quantity of these growth factors to stimulate recovery in non-healing injuries. For 20 years, the application of autologous PRP has been safely used and documented in many fields including; orthopedics, sports medicine, dentistry, ENT, neurosurgery, ophthalmology, urology, wound healing, cosmetic, cardiothoracic, and maxillofacial surgery. This article introduces the reader to PRP therapy and reviews the current literature on this emerging treatment modality. In summary, PRP provides a promising alternative to surgery by promoting safe and natural healing. However, there are few controlled trials, and mostly anecdotal or case reports. Additionally the sample sizes are frequently small, limiting the generalization of the findings. Recently, there is emerging literature on the beneficial effects of PRP for chronic non-healing tendon injuries including lateral epicondylitis and plantar fasciitis and cartilage degeneration (Mishra and Pavelko, The American Journal of Sports Medicine 10(10):1-5, 2006; Barrett and Erredge, Podiatry Today 17:37-42, 2004). However, as clinical use increases, more controlled studies are needed to further understand this treatment.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 9 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 416 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 5 1%
France 2 <1%
Chile 2 <1%
Indonesia 1 <1%
Australia 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
Turkey 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
Other 6 1%
Unknown 395 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 71 17%
Student > Master 47 11%
Other 46 11%
Student > Postgraduate 38 9%
Student > Ph. D. Student 36 9%
Other 100 24%
Unknown 78 19%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 202 49%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 36 9%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 11 3%
Nursing and Health Professions 10 2%
Sports and Recreations 10 2%
Other 51 12%
Unknown 96 23%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 32. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 October 2023.
All research outputs
#1,242,466
of 25,373,627 outputs
Outputs from Current Reviews in Musculoskeletal Medicine
#37
of 539 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#2,784
of 95,943 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Current Reviews in Musculoskeletal Medicine
#2
of 5 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,373,627 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 539 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.7. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 95,943 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 5 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 3 of them.