↓ Skip to main content

Long-term outcomes of vaginal mesh versus native tissue repair for anterior vaginal wall prolapse

Overview of attention for article published in International Urogynecology Journal & Pelvic Floor Dysfunction, February 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (81st percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (84th percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source
twitter
6 tweeters
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
30 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
28 Mendeley
Title
Long-term outcomes of vaginal mesh versus native tissue repair for anterior vaginal wall prolapse
Published in
International Urogynecology Journal & Pelvic Floor Dysfunction, February 2013
DOI 10.1007/s00192-013-2043-9
Pubmed ID
Authors

Michele Jonsson Funk, Anthony G. Visco, Alison C. Weidner, Virginia Pate, Jennifer M. Wu

Abstract

To estimate the risk of repeat surgery for recurrent prolapse or mesh removal after vaginal mesh versus native tissue repair for anterior vaginal wall prolapse.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 6 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 28 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 28 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 4 14%
Student > Doctoral Student 4 14%
Student > Postgraduate 3 11%
Professor > Associate Professor 3 11%
Researcher 3 11%
Other 11 39%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 19 68%
Engineering 3 11%
Unspecified 2 7%
Nursing and Health Professions 1 4%
Neuroscience 1 4%
Other 2 7%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 08 July 2019.
All research outputs
#2,412,398
of 13,605,490 outputs
Outputs from International Urogynecology Journal & Pelvic Floor Dysfunction
#183
of 1,204 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#26,511
of 145,225 outputs
Outputs of similar age from International Urogynecology Journal & Pelvic Floor Dysfunction
#5
of 32 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 13,605,490 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 82nd percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,204 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.4. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 145,225 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 32 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its contemporaries.