| Title |
Towards a biological definition of ARDS: are treatable traits the solution?
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Intensive Care Medicine Experimental, March 2022
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s40635-022-00435-w |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Lieuwe D. J. Bos, John G. Laffey, Lorraine B. Ware, Nanon F. L. Heijnen, Pratik Sinha, Brijesh Patel, Matthieu Jabaudon, Julie A. Bastarache, Daniel F. McAuley, Charlotte Summers, Carolyn S. Calfee, Manu Shankar-Hari |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 35 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 4 | 11% |
| Netherlands | 3 | 9% |
| Ireland | 2 | 6% |
| Italy | 2 | 6% |
| France | 2 | 6% |
| Sweden | 1 | 3% |
| Canada | 1 | 3% |
| Peru | 1 | 3% |
| Chile | 1 | 3% |
| Other | 3 | 9% |
| Unknown | 15 | 43% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 14 | 40% |
| Scientists | 13 | 37% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 5 | 14% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 3 | 9% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 35 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 35 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 5 | 14% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 4 | 11% |
| Other | 3 | 9% |
| Student > Bachelor | 1 | 3% |
| Professor | 1 | 3% |
| Other | 5 | 14% |
| Unknown | 16 | 46% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 12 | 34% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 3 | 9% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 1 | 3% |
| Immunology and Microbiology | 1 | 3% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 1 | 3% |
| Other | 2 | 6% |
| Unknown | 15 | 43% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 21. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 March 2022.
All research outputs
#1,758,371
of 25,292,646 outputs
Outputs from Intensive Care Medicine Experimental
#47
of 533 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#40,903
of 436,051 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Intensive Care Medicine Experimental
#5
of 14 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,292,646 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 93rd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 533 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.8. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 436,051 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 14 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 71% of its contemporaries.