The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Title |
Complementary and alternative medicine utilization by a sample of infertile couples in Jordan for infertility treatment: clinics-based survey
|
---|---|
Published in |
BMC Complementary Medicine and Therapies, February 2013
|
DOI | 10.1186/1472-6882-13-35 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Sanaa K Bardaweel, Mayadah Shehadeh, Ghadeer ARY Suaifan, Maria-Vanessa Z Kilani |
Abstract |
Although there is little information available to quantify the use of complementary and alternative medicine (CAM), growing evidence suggests that CAM prevalence among patients seeking infertility treatment is increasing worldwide. There are many products available on the market and many infertile patients demand information about CAM from their health care providers. This paper investigates the prevalence of CAM use among infertile couples in Jordan. Additionally, trends and factors contributing to CAM use for infertility treatment among these couples have been evaluated. |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United States | 3 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 3 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 94 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United States | 1 | 1% |
Unknown | 93 | 99% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Ph. D. Student | 14 | 15% |
Researcher | 10 | 11% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 9 | 10% |
Student > Bachelor | 8 | 9% |
Student > Master | 7 | 7% |
Other | 21 | 22% |
Unknown | 25 | 27% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 23 | 24% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 10 | 11% |
Social Sciences | 8 | 9% |
Psychology | 6 | 6% |
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 5 | 5% |
Other | 19 | 20% |
Unknown | 23 | 24% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 August 2022.
All research outputs
#5,512,764
of 22,696,971 outputs
Outputs from BMC Complementary Medicine and Therapies
#901
of 3,619 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#44,774
of 191,513 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Complementary Medicine and Therapies
#18
of 68 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,696,971 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 75th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,619 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.5. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 74% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 191,513 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 68 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its contemporaries.