| Title |
To what extent residual alveolar ridge can be preserved by implant? A systematic review
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
International Journal of Implant Dentistry, November 2016
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s40729-016-0057-z |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Ahmed Khalifa Khalifa, Masahiro Wada, Kazunori Ikebe, Yoshinobu Maeda |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 93 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 93 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 20 | 22% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 12 | 13% |
| Researcher | 5 | 5% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 4 | 4% |
| Lecturer | 3 | 3% |
| Other | 11 | 12% |
| Unknown | 38 | 41% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 49 | 53% |
| Chemical Engineering | 2 | 2% |
| Materials Science | 2 | 2% |
| Unspecified | 1 | 1% |
| Arts and Humanities | 1 | 1% |
| Other | 2 | 2% |
| Unknown | 36 | 39% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 June 2022.
All research outputs
#7,429,612
of 22,714,025 outputs
Outputs from International Journal of Implant Dentistry
#16
of 103 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#137,193
of 414,342 outputs
Outputs of similar age from International Journal of Implant Dentistry
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,714,025 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 103 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 1.7. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 414,342 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 54% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them