↓ Skip to main content

Severe weather disasters in China linked to solar activity during 1-1825 Common Era

Overview of attention for article published in Geoscience Letters, March 2022
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (58th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (91st percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
4 X users
video
1 YouTube creator

Citations

dimensions_citation
2 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
5 Mendeley
Title
Severe weather disasters in China linked to solar activity during 1-1825 Common Era
Published in
Geoscience Letters, March 2022
DOI 10.1186/s40562-021-00210-x
Authors

Jann-Yenq Liu, Yuh-Ing Chen, Po-Han Lee, Chi-Shen Huang, Tzu-Wei Fang

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 5 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 5 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Unknown 5 100%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Computer Science 1 20%
Unknown 4 80%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 August 2022.
All research outputs
#13,680,464
of 24,221,802 outputs
Outputs from Geoscience Letters
#60
of 208 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#175,051
of 431,770 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Geoscience Letters
#2
of 12 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,221,802 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 208 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.5. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 431,770 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 58% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 12 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.