| Title |
Selection of the high efficient sgRNA for CRISPR-Cas9 to edit herbicide related genes, PDS, ALS, and EPSPS in tomato
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Applied Biological Chemistry, February 2022
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s13765-022-00679-w |
| Authors |
So Hee Yang, Euyeon Kim, Hyosun Park, Yeonjong Koo |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 19 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 19 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 2 | 11% |
| Unspecified | 1 | 5% |
| Lecturer | 1 | 5% |
| Other | 1 | 5% |
| Professor | 1 | 5% |
| Other | 1 | 5% |
| Unknown | 12 | 63% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 3 | 16% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 2 | 11% |
| Computer Science | 1 | 5% |
| Unspecified | 1 | 5% |
| Unknown | 12 | 63% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 02 March 2022.
All research outputs
#4,489,860
of 23,999,200 outputs
Outputs from Applied Biological Chemistry
#4
of 72 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#108,999
of 509,944 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Applied Biological Chemistry
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,999,200 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 80th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 72 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.4. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 509,944 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them