↓ Skip to main content

A simple method for algal species discrimination in East China Sea, using multiple satellite imagery

Overview of attention for article published in Geoscience Letters, February 2022
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (52nd percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (76th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
3 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
2 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
8 Mendeley
Title
A simple method for algal species discrimination in East China Sea, using multiple satellite imagery
Published in
Geoscience Letters, February 2022
DOI 10.1186/s40562-022-00222-1
Authors

Chi Feng, Joji Ishizaka, Shengqiang Wang

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 8 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 8 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 1 13%
Professor 1 13%
Researcher 1 13%
Student > Doctoral Student 1 13%
Unknown 4 50%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Earth and Planetary Sciences 2 25%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 13%
Unknown 5 63%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 March 2022.
All research outputs
#14,003,146
of 23,230,825 outputs
Outputs from Geoscience Letters
#71
of 193 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#202,013
of 441,519 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Geoscience Letters
#4
of 13 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,230,825 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 38th percentile – i.e., 38% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 193 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.4. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 63% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 441,519 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 52% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 13 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its contemporaries.