↓ Skip to main content

Dust Devil Sediment Transport: From Lab to Field to Global Impact

Overview of attention for article published in Space Science Reviews, July 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age

Mentioned by

twitter
2 tweeters

Citations

dimensions_citation
21 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
22 Mendeley
Title
Dust Devil Sediment Transport: From Lab to Field to Global Impact
Published in
Space Science Reviews, July 2016
DOI 10.1007/s11214-016-0261-4
Authors

Martina Klose, Bradley C. Jemmett-Smith, Henrik Kahanpää, Melinda Kahre, Peter Knippertz, Mark T. Lemmon, Stephen R. Lewis, Ralph D. Lorenz, Lynn D. V. Neakrase, Claire Newman, Manish R. Patel, Dennis Reiss, Aymeric Spiga, Patrick L. Whelley

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 22 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 22 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 7 32%
Student > Ph. D. Student 4 18%
Professor > Associate Professor 2 9%
Student > Master 2 9%
Unspecified 2 9%
Other 5 23%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Earth and Planetary Sciences 7 32%
Unspecified 7 32%
Physics and Astronomy 4 18%
Environmental Science 2 9%
Engineering 2 9%
Other 0 0%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 October 2016.
All research outputs
#7,097,248
of 12,337,531 outputs
Outputs from Space Science Reviews
#407
of 565 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#126,007
of 265,404 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Space Science Reviews
#11
of 13 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 12,337,531 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 40th percentile – i.e., 40% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 565 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.8. This one is in the 26th percentile – i.e., 26% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 265,404 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 49th percentile – i.e., 49% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 13 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 15th percentile – i.e., 15% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.