↓ Skip to main content

Assessing the impact of different penalty factors of the Bayesian reconstruction algorithm Q.Clear on in vivo low count kinetic analysis of [11C]PHNO brain PET-MR studies

Overview of attention for article published in EJNMMI Research, February 2022
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
7 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
10 Mendeley
Title
Assessing the impact of different penalty factors of the Bayesian reconstruction algorithm Q.Clear on in vivo low count kinetic analysis of [11C]PHNO brain PET-MR studies
Published in
EJNMMI Research, February 2022
DOI 10.1186/s13550-022-00883-1
Pubmed ID
Authors

Daniela Ribeiro, William Hallett, Oliver Howes, Robert McCutcheon, Matthew M. Nour, Adriana A. S. Tavares

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 10 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 10 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Doctoral Student 2 20%
Professor > Associate Professor 1 10%
Unknown 7 70%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Nursing and Health Professions 1 10%
Computer Science 1 10%
Physics and Astronomy 1 10%
Unknown 7 70%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 March 2022.
All research outputs
#18,855,685
of 23,365,820 outputs
Outputs from EJNMMI Research
#350
of 572 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#317,763
of 441,085 outputs
Outputs of similar age from EJNMMI Research
#8
of 14 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,365,820 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 572 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.6. This one is in the 29th percentile – i.e., 29% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 441,085 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 17th percentile – i.e., 17% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 14 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.