Title |
Caffeine in surface and wastewaters in Barbados, West Indies
|
---|---|
Published in |
SpringerPlus, February 2015
|
DOI | 10.1186/s40064-015-0809-x |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Quincy A Edwards, Sergei M Kulikov, Leah D Garner-O’Neale |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 105 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 105 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Bachelor | 19 | 18% |
Student > Master | 18 | 17% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 15 | 14% |
Researcher | 5 | 5% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 4 | 4% |
Other | 10 | 10% |
Unknown | 34 | 32% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Environmental Science | 21 | 20% |
Chemistry | 18 | 17% |
Chemical Engineering | 7 | 7% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 6 | 6% |
Engineering | 5 | 5% |
Other | 9 | 9% |
Unknown | 39 | 37% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 15. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 February 2022.
All research outputs
#2,046,806
of 23,206,358 outputs
Outputs from SpringerPlus
#121
of 1,854 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#30,871
of 354,292 outputs
Outputs of similar age from SpringerPlus
#4
of 60 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,206,358 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 91st percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,854 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.8. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 354,292 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 60 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.