↓ Skip to main content

A comparison of zero-inflated and hurdle models for modeling zero-inflated count data

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Statistical Distributions and Applications , June 2021
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age

Mentioned by

twitter
4 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
97 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
147 Mendeley
Title
A comparison of zero-inflated and hurdle models for modeling zero-inflated count data
Published in
Journal of Statistical Distributions and Applications , June 2021
DOI 10.1186/s40488-021-00121-4
Pubmed ID
Authors

Cindy Xin Feng

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 147 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 147 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 32 22%
Student > Master 21 14%
Researcher 14 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 8 5%
Student > Bachelor 7 5%
Other 20 14%
Unknown 45 31%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 19 13%
Medicine and Dentistry 11 7%
Social Sciences 9 6%
Environmental Science 8 5%
Computer Science 6 4%
Other 41 28%
Unknown 53 36%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 August 2023.
All research outputs
#15,352,618
of 25,655,374 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Statistical Distributions and Applications
#13
of 41 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#221,187
of 457,233 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Statistical Distributions and Applications
#2
of 2 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,655,374 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 38th percentile – i.e., 38% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 41 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.2. This one scored the same or higher as 28 of them.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 457,233 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 49th percentile – i.e., 49% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 2 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.