↓ Skip to main content

Face masks versus sunglasses: limited effects of time and individual differences in the ability to judge facial identity and social traits

Overview of attention for article published in Cognitive Research: Principles and Implications, February 2022
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (90th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (70th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
blogs
1 blog
twitter
4 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
14 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
29 Mendeley
Title
Face masks versus sunglasses: limited effects of time and individual differences in the ability to judge facial identity and social traits
Published in
Cognitive Research: Principles and Implications, February 2022
DOI 10.1186/s41235-022-00371-z
Pubmed ID
Authors

Rachel J. Bennetts, Poppy Johnson Humphrey, Paulina Zielinska, Sarah Bate

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 29 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 29 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 3 10%
Professor 3 10%
Student > Bachelor 2 7%
Researcher 2 7%
Student > Doctoral Student 1 3%
Other 2 7%
Unknown 16 55%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 10 34%
Computer Science 1 3%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 3%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 1 3%
Engineering 1 3%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 15 52%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 19. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 July 2022.
All research outputs
#1,707,104
of 22,908,162 outputs
Outputs from Cognitive Research: Principles and Implications
#75
of 319 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#41,728
of 435,698 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cognitive Research: Principles and Implications
#6
of 20 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,908,162 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 92nd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 319 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 44.0. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 435,698 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 20 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its contemporaries.