| Title |
Altitude of pulsating arcs as inferred from tomographic measurements
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Earth, Planets and Space, February 2022
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s40623-022-01592-8 |
| Authors |
Vladimir Safargaleev, Tima Sergienko, Keisuke Hosokawa, Shin-ichiro Oyama, Yasunobu Ogawa, Yoshizumi Miyoshi, Satoshi Kurita, Ryochi Fujii |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 2 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Scientists | 1 | 50% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 50% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 February 2022.
All research outputs
#17,301,727
of 25,392,582 outputs
Outputs from Earth, Planets and Space
#1,109
of 1,472 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#271,915
of 450,485 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Earth, Planets and Space
#38
of 47 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,392,582 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,472 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.9. This one is in the 14th percentile – i.e., 14% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 450,485 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 29th percentile – i.e., 29% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 47 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.