@LapiGreg @seraphus7 @El_Dic_TatoR Celui qui parle de consensus scientifique démontre qu'il ne comprend rien à la science. Rien de rien. https://t.co/AWuVOXLaOv. Michael Crichton, sur le consensus en science : https://t.co/J6WBvavhxt
Consensus Science and the Peer Review https://t.co/mZ3yNNZ5Od via @UCLA 's Emeritus Prof #JorgeBarrio @susan_bewley @TomPMarshall
@batviruses @_everythingism @BretWeinstein Clearly YOU don't understand science. https://t.co/gjHa509HLj
@EdwardRocket1 @ChunterGB @TrekMovie @CapnBranFlakes @Reddit Problems with this approach, too, I know... but filtering, overall, is a very complex process. You need to engineer it somehow, and hopefully not throw away the scientific process in the process
@TomTalksPoli @ChunterGB @TrekMovie @CapnBranFlakes @Reddit So by misinformation they mean that which discourages people to get vaccinated? I think that's a reasonable wish. I'm pro vax and am annoyed by outright crazy people. But I don't want new informa
RT @KeillerDon: @GeraldKutney @arxvltd @DawnTJ90 There is no place for consensus in science. #Climatechange #ClimateCrisis #climatebrawl h…
@KeillerDon @GeraldKutney That "peer reviewed" article looks more like just another opinion piece to me.. https://t.co/ImW3iBKjRU
@GeraldKutney You really are lacking in comprehension, Gerald. The link I provided was to a peer-reviewed paper. Your supposed “Gold Standard”. Here it is again. #Climatechange #ClimateCrisis #climatebrawl https://t.co/uMHvMheqkJ https://t.co/ICigs8DOnV
RT @KeillerDon: @GeraldKutney @arxvltd @DawnTJ90 There is no place for consensus in science. #Climatechange #ClimateCrisis #climatebrawl h…
RT @KeillerDon: @GeraldKutney @arxvltd @DawnTJ90 There is no place for consensus in science. #Climatechange #ClimateCrisis #climatebrawl h…
@GeraldKutney @arxvltd @DawnTJ90 There is no place for consensus in science. #Climatechange #ClimateCrisis #climatebrawl https://t.co/uMHvMheqkJ https://t.co/G73JS9GUH0
@GeraldKutney The fact you think consensus is good for science, shows just how little you know about science, Gerald. #Climatechange #ClimateCrisis #climatebrawl https://t.co/uMHvMheqkJ https://t.co/awL47ZThVn
@andreavetsch @srfnews Lesen Sie Popper, oder diesen kurzen Text. https://t.co/pcscROBVvQ
@fabfigue @primetiger08 @GeorgeGammon Your "expertise" in evidence based health science seems to have not helped you work out that masks have little to no benefit in stopping spread of respiratory viruses. Try thinking for yourself. Science does not have a
RT @natecooley: @_LukeCSkywalker @jordanbpeterson “[T] claim of consensus has been the first refuge of scoundrels; it is a way to avoid deb…
“Consensus is the business of politics. Science, on the contrary, requires only one investigator who happens to be right, which means that he or she has results that are verifiable by reference to the real world. In science consensus is irrelevant. “
@ConceptualJames Consensus is NOT science. “Consensus is the business of politics.”
@_LukeCSkywalker @jordanbpeterson “[T] claim of consensus has been the first refuge of scoundrels; it is a way to avoid debate by claiming that the matter is already settled. Whenever you hear the consensus of scientists agrees ..., reach for your wallet,
RT @mindterrorist: @TheVaccination @LynnleeMavakay @kidoctr @biowheel Some good articles looking logically, not with ones head so far up yo…
@TheVaccination @LynnleeMavakay @kidoctr @biowheel Some good articles looking logically, not with ones head so far up your ass it's back to where it belongs but your back hurts and your face is covered in bile and shit, at "scientific consensus": https://t
@micahsb @ChrisMurphyCT “There’s no such thing as consensus in science. It it’s consensus it isn’t science. If it’s science it isn’t consensus. Period.” https://t.co/LiIst5p0r3 The consensus argument is a logical fallacy: Argumentum ad populum. https://t
@DougHeaton88 @PolitiBunny @ColMorrisDavis @NatSecLisa @realDonaldTrump Peer review is also part of what has caused people not to trust science. Michael Crichton said it well. https://t.co/dL1Xo0tzMk
RT @sroman88: "The greatest scientists in history are great precisely because they broke with the consensus. There is no such thing as cons…
"The greatest scientists in history are great precisely because they broke with the consensus. There is no such thing as consensus science. If it’s consensus, it isn’t science. If it's science, it isn't consensus. Period."https://t.co/fV3gc6bpdG
RT @elazar_13: "Whenever you hear the consensus of scientists agrees on something or other, reach for your wallet, because you’re being had…
RT @elazar_13: "Quando vi dicono che la maggioranza degli scienziati è d'accordo su questo o su quello, toccatevi il portafoglio, perché vi…
"Quando vi dicono che la maggioranza degli scienziati è d'accordo su questo o su quello, toccatevi il portafoglio, perché vi stanno imbrogliando." (Michael Crichton)
"Whenever you hear the consensus of scientists agrees on something or other, reach for your wallet, because you’re being had." (Michael Crichton) https://t.co/p1iqGruyiZ
“...consensus is invoked only in situations where the science is not solid enough. [...] Nobody says the consensus is that the sun is 93 million miles away. It would never occur to anyone to speak that way” (M. Crichton). https://t.co/p1iqGruyiZ
@jbinero @Riadh_B @vrtpano @vrtnws U zou beter dit even lezen en beseffen dat consensus als argument een politiek argument is en niets maar dan ook niets met wetenschap te maken. https://t.co/Hz3cvuGAAW https://t.co/nf9HO4fD9N
@JohanBranders @Roebey @mboudry @Mirariproject Beroep doen op consensus is politiek en heeft niets met wetenschap te maken en klimaatontkenner woordgebruik blijft verwerpelijk. Mag ik de definitie daar trouwens eens van hebben? https://t.co/Hz3cvuoZJo htt
Hard work getting your ideas out there when they oppose those of the people that control the funding.... https://t.co/TukTyNwGOT
RT @acebb20: @ezraklein You don't seem to understand that "scientific consensus" is silly bullshit. You should read more and talk less. htt…
RT @acebb20: @ezraklein You don't seem to understand that "scientific consensus" is silly bullshit. You should read more and talk less. htt…
RT @humancell: Consensus is NOT Science. Science is NOT Consensus | Consensus Science and the Peer Review #fb https://t.co/y0eK570QfL
Consensus is NOT Science. Science is NOT Consensus | Consensus Science and the Peer Review #fb https://t.co/y0eK570QfL
Consensus Science Michael Crichton https://t.co/Vr30yFwWup
"consensus science as an extremely pernicious development" by M. Crichton in https://t.co/3lgBKOCG48 via @curryja
Consensus Science and the Peer Review http://t.co/LEFNejPjDX
Consensus Science and the Peer Review http://t.co/iHIjdiixxg
@AbbyMartin The idea that there's this 'consensus' in science is only politics - and not science at all http://t.co/t0SBA18BBn #climate
Nota bene #GMO pushers: Consensus is invoked only in situations where the science is not solid enough http://t.co/poUu678v0Z
Consensus Science and the Peer Review http://t.co/eUqus0Rux5
Transgénicos: la ciencia de los consensos y el peer review http://t.co/UU83O48oVq ( en inglés)
"There is no such thing as consensus science. If it’s consensus, it isn’t science. If it's science, it isn't... http://t.co/FrJs2Ynfca
Nota bene #GMO pushers: Consensus is invoked only in situations where the science is not solid enough http://t.co/poUu678v0Z
@beachvetlbc agree @keithkloor Consensus Science and the Peer Review http://t.co/O5sTu9Knd6
@michaelpollan Consensus Science and the Peer Review http://t.co/O5sTu9Knd6
"There is no such thing as consensus science. If it’s consensus, it isn’t science. If it's science, it isn't... http://t.co/FrJs2Ynfca
"There is no such thing as consensus science. If it’s consensus, it isn’t science. If it's science, it isn't... http://t.co/FrJs2Ynfca
Nota bene #GMO pushers: Consensus is invoked only in situations where the science is not solid enough http://t.co/poUu678v0Z
Nota bene #GMO pushers: Consensus is invoked only in situations where the science is not solid enough http://t.co/poUu678v0Z
Consensus Science & the Peer Review http://t.co/O5sTu9Knd6 RT @MadeleineLove Sad 2 C the same names bashing responses on article posts
#GMO promoters' "scientific consensus"—"pernicious" "1st refuge of scoundrels" http://t.co/lue4cQcbkt Via @MadeleineLove @Angelmountain5
#GMO promoters' "scientific consensus"—"pernicious" "1st refuge of scoundrels" http://t.co/lue4cQcbkt Via @MadeleineLove @Angelmountain5
#GMO promoters' "scientific consensus"—"pernicious" "1st refuge of scoundrels" http://t.co/lue4cQcbkt Via @MadeleineLove @Angelmountain5
#GMO promoters' "scientific consensus"—"pernicious" "1st refuge of scoundrels" http://t.co/lue4cQcbkt Via @MadeleineLove @Angelmountain5
#GMO trolls go on about "scientific consensus". Top editor calls it "pernicious" & "the first refuge of scoundrels." http://t.co/cl1hPwod1z
#GMO trolls go on about "scientific consensus". Top editor calls it "pernicious" & "the first refuge of scoundrels." http://t.co/cl1hPwod1z
#GMO trolls go on about "scientific consensus". Top editor calls it "pernicious" & "the first refuge of scoundrels." http://t.co/cl1hPwod1z
Fantastic article about "concensus science". Michael Crichton is awesome. I believe this applies to Global warming. http://t.co/RcJHZpDiQU
Consensus Science and the Peer Review http://t.co/CSRUOPSJ