| Title |
The role of structured inquiry, open inquiry, and epistemological beliefs in developing secondary students’ scientific and mathematical literacies
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
International Journal of STEM Education, February 2022
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s40594-022-00329-z |
| Authors |
Hsin-Hui Wang, Zuway-R Hong, Hsiao-Ching She, Thomas J. Smith, Jill Fielding, Huann-shyang Lin |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 1 | 20% |
| Egypt | 1 | 20% |
| Unknown | 3 | 60% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 3 | 60% |
| Scientists | 2 | 40% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 128 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 128 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Lecturer | 19 | 15% |
| Student > Bachelor | 6 | 5% |
| Unspecified | 4 | 3% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 4 | 3% |
| Student > Master | 4 | 3% |
| Other | 9 | 7% |
| Unknown | 82 | 64% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Social Sciences | 16 | 13% |
| Mathematics | 8 | 6% |
| Unspecified | 6 | 5% |
| Physics and Astronomy | 4 | 3% |
| Chemistry | 2 | 2% |
| Other | 9 | 7% |
| Unknown | 83 | 65% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 January 2023.
All research outputs
#14,729,372
of 25,579,912 outputs
Outputs from International Journal of STEM Education
#239
of 430 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#222,957
of 520,026 outputs
Outputs of similar age from International Journal of STEM Education
#17
of 26 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,579,912 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 41st percentile – i.e., 41% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 430 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.3. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 520,026 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 56% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 26 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 30th percentile – i.e., 30% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.