↓ Skip to main content

Types of lime binders in mortars used for the construction of the Ming Great Wall of China and their importance for the development of a conservation strategy

Overview of attention for article published in Built Heritage, February 2022
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Readers on

mendeley
11 Mendeley
Title
Types of lime binders in mortars used for the construction of the Ming Great Wall of China and their importance for the development of a conservation strategy
Published in
Built Heritage, February 2022
DOI 10.1186/s43238-022-00047-z
Authors

Tanja Dettmering, Shibing Dai

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 11 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 11 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Unspecified 1 9%
Student > Ph. D. Student 1 9%
Researcher 1 9%
Unknown 8 73%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Arts and Humanities 1 9%
Chemical Engineering 1 9%
Unspecified 1 9%
Engineering 1 9%
Unknown 7 64%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 February 2022.
All research outputs
#15,536,861
of 23,090,520 outputs
Outputs from Built Heritage
#25
of 56 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#282,435
of 505,350 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Built Heritage
#5
of 10 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,090,520 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 56 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.4. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 505,350 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 31st percentile – i.e., 31% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 10 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 5 of them.