↓ Skip to main content

Rifampin-warfarin interaction in a mitral valve replacement patient receiving rifampin for infective endocarditis: a case report

Overview of attention for article published in SpringerPlus, January 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (55th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
18 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
31 Mendeley
Title
Rifampin-warfarin interaction in a mitral valve replacement patient receiving rifampin for infective endocarditis: a case report
Published in
SpringerPlus, January 2016
DOI 10.1186/s40064-015-1653-8
Pubmed ID
Authors

Amr Mohamed Fahmi, Osama Abdelsamad, Hazem Elewa

Abstract

Warfarin therapy is associated with many drug interactions that may cause a significant alteration in its anticoagulant effect. Rifampin is a widely used antimicrobial that has major interactions with several medications including warfarin due to its strong P-glycoprotein and liver enzyme inducer activity especially on CYP2C9, CYP3A4, CYP1A2 and CYP2C19. We report a case of a 34-year-old Srilankan female chronically treated with warfarin for her mitral valve replacement. The patient developed infective endocarditis and was started on a 6-week treatment with rifampin along with other antibiotics. Warfarin dose was increased from 52.5 to 210 mg/week over the course of the rifampin therapy, however, the INR remained subtherapeutic throughout the whole period and reached 2.4 by the end of rifampin therapy. Anticoagulation management was challenging in the period following the end of rifampin therapy as well, and multiple dose adjustments starting with an increase and followed by reduction were required till she was stable on an 80 mg/week warfarin dose 5 weeks post-rifampin therapy. Our findings suggest the importance of close monitoring of warfarin therapy during and after the use of rifampin to minimize the risks of under and over-anticoagulation and improve the safety and efficacy of warfarin therapy.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 31 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 31 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 7 23%
Student > Ph. D. Student 5 16%
Student > Bachelor 3 10%
Researcher 3 10%
Unspecified 3 10%
Other 5 16%
Unknown 5 16%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 13 42%
Medicine and Dentistry 6 19%
Unspecified 3 10%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 1 3%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 3%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 7 23%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 May 2019.
All research outputs
#16,581,265
of 24,396,012 outputs
Outputs from SpringerPlus
#954
of 1,859 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#240,451
of 402,595 outputs
Outputs of similar age from SpringerPlus
#58
of 175 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,396,012 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,859 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.0. This one is in the 34th percentile – i.e., 34% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 402,595 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 31st percentile – i.e., 31% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 175 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 55% of its contemporaries.