↓ Skip to main content

BioBanking as the central tool for translational medicine CTM issue 2013

Overview of attention for article published in Clinical and Translational Medicine, February 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user
facebook
2 Facebook pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
20 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
30 Mendeley
Title
BioBanking as the central tool for translational medicine CTM issue 2013
Published in
Clinical and Translational Medicine, February 2013
DOI 10.1186/2001-1326-2-4
Pubmed ID
Authors

György Marko‐Varga

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 30 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Japan 1 3%
Netherlands 1 3%
United States 1 3%
China 1 3%
Unknown 26 87%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 10 33%
Student > Ph. D. Student 3 10%
Student > Postgraduate 3 10%
Other 2 7%
Student > Master 2 7%
Other 3 10%
Unknown 7 23%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 9 30%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 6 20%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 3 10%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 2 7%
Computer Science 1 3%
Other 1 3%
Unknown 8 27%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 May 2013.
All research outputs
#17,932,284
of 26,017,215 outputs
Outputs from Clinical and Translational Medicine
#590
of 1,080 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#201,918
of 297,359 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Clinical and Translational Medicine
#4
of 7 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,017,215 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 20th percentile – i.e., 20% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,080 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.1. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 297,359 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 23rd percentile – i.e., 23% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 7 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 3 of them.