↓ Skip to main content

Critical reflexivity in financial markets: a Hawkes process analysis

Overview of attention for article published in arXiv, October 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (71st percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (89th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
7 tweeters

Citations

dimensions_citation
46 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
62 Mendeley
Title
Critical reflexivity in financial markets: a Hawkes process analysis
Published in
arXiv, October 2013
DOI 10.1140/epjb/e2013-40107-3
Authors

Stephen J. Hardiman, Nicolas Bercot, Jean-Philippe Bouchaud

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 7 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 62 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 2 3%
France 2 3%
Japan 2 3%
China 1 2%
Tunisia 1 2%
Unknown 54 87%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 16 26%
Researcher 15 24%
Student > Master 8 13%
Student > Doctoral Student 7 11%
Student > Bachelor 4 6%
Other 12 19%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 18 29%
Mathematics 17 27%
Physics and Astronomy 11 18%
Unspecified 5 8%
Computer Science 4 6%
Other 7 11%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 July 2013.
All research outputs
#2,449,417
of 9,771,259 outputs
Outputs from arXiv
#65,249
of 544,226 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#84,321
of 307,255 outputs
Outputs of similar age from arXiv
#889
of 8,991 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 9,771,259 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 74th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 544,226 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.8. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 307,255 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 71% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 8,991 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its contemporaries.