↓ Skip to main content

Critical reflexivity in financial markets: a Hawkes process analysis

Overview of attention for article published in Journal de Physique I, October 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (70th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (67th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
6 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
115 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
85 Mendeley
Title
Critical reflexivity in financial markets: a Hawkes process analysis
Published in
Journal de Physique I, October 2013
DOI 10.1140/epjb/e2013-40107-3
Authors

Stephen J. Hardiman, Nicolas Bercot, Jean-Philippe Bouchaud

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 6 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 85 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
France 2 2%
United States 2 2%
Tunisia 1 1%
Japan 1 1%
China 1 1%
Unknown 78 92%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 19 22%
Researcher 17 20%
Student > Master 11 13%
Student > Doctoral Student 9 11%
Student > Bachelor 6 7%
Other 15 18%
Unknown 8 9%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 22 26%
Mathematics 20 24%
Physics and Astronomy 13 15%
Computer Science 6 7%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 3 4%
Other 9 11%
Unknown 12 14%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 July 2013.
All research outputs
#7,363,939
of 25,394,764 outputs
Outputs from Journal de Physique I
#317
of 1,477 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#63,958
of 225,669 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal de Physique I
#10
of 31 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,394,764 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 69th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,477 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.5. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 225,669 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 31 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 67% of its contemporaries.