Title |
Coral-virus interactions: A double-edged sword?
|
---|---|
Published in |
Symbiosis, February 2009
|
DOI | 10.1007/bf03179964 |
Authors |
Madeleine J. H. van Oppen, Jo-Ann Leong, Ruth D. Gates |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 128 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United States | 5 | 4% |
United Arab Emirates | 1 | <1% |
Malaysia | 1 | <1% |
Colombia | 1 | <1% |
New Caledonia | 1 | <1% |
Australia | 1 | <1% |
United Kingdom | 1 | <1% |
Netherlands | 1 | <1% |
New Zealand | 1 | <1% |
Other | 3 | 2% |
Unknown | 112 | 88% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Ph. D. Student | 33 | 26% |
Researcher | 25 | 20% |
Student > Bachelor | 24 | 19% |
Student > Master | 13 | 10% |
Lecturer | 5 | 4% |
Other | 13 | 10% |
Unknown | 15 | 12% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 76 | 59% |
Environmental Science | 20 | 16% |
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 6 | 5% |
Earth and Planetary Sciences | 3 | 2% |
Immunology and Microbiology | 2 | 2% |
Other | 4 | 3% |
Unknown | 17 | 13% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 06 February 2013.
All research outputs
#5,846,938
of 22,694,633 outputs
Outputs from Symbiosis
#67
of 255 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#39,379
of 170,164 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Symbiosis
#5
of 8 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,694,633 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 74th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 255 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.9. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 170,164 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 8 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 3 of them.