↓ Skip to main content

The function of regressions in reading: Backward eye movements allow rereading

Overview of attention for article published in Memory & Cognition, August 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

peer_reviews
1 peer review site

Citations

dimensions_citation
22 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
62 Mendeley
Title
The function of regressions in reading: Backward eye movements allow rereading
Published in
Memory & Cognition, August 2012
DOI 10.3758/s13421-012-0244-y
Pubmed ID
Authors

Robert W. Booth, Ulrich W. Weger

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 62 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Germany 1 2%
United Kingdom 1 2%
Brazil 1 2%
United States 1 2%
Unknown 58 94%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 16 26%
Student > Master 11 18%
Student > Doctoral Student 6 10%
Researcher 6 10%
Student > Bachelor 5 8%
Other 18 29%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 27 44%
Linguistics 7 11%
Computer Science 5 8%
Medicine and Dentistry 5 8%
Unspecified 4 6%
Other 14 23%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 September 2016.
All research outputs
#4,499,996
of 8,425,604 outputs
Outputs from Memory & Cognition
#549
of 1,001 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#139,738
of 253,357 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Memory & Cognition
#12
of 26 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 8,425,604 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 27th percentile – i.e., 27% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,001 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.3. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 253,357 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 35th percentile – i.e., 35% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 26 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.