↓ Skip to main content

Reliability and validity of the Japanese version of the Pediatric Quality of Life Inventory Infant Scales

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Patient-Reported Outcomes, January 2022
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 tweeter

Citations

dimensions_citation
2 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
8 Mendeley
Title
Reliability and validity of the Japanese version of the Pediatric Quality of Life Inventory Infant Scales
Published in
Journal of Patient-Reported Outcomes, January 2022
DOI 10.1186/s41687-022-00416-3
Authors

Iori Sato, Takafumi Soejima, Mari Ikeda, Kyoko Kobayashi, Ami Setoyama, Kiyoko Kamibeppu

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 tweeter who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 8 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 8 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Unspecified 2 25%
Student > Master 2 25%
Student > Postgraduate 1 13%
Other 1 13%
Unknown 2 25%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 3 38%
Unspecified 2 25%
Psychology 1 13%
Nursing and Health Professions 1 13%
Unknown 1 13%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 January 2022.
All research outputs
#18,577,751
of 23,009,818 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Patient-Reported Outcomes
#392
of 503 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#363,142
of 503,575 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Patient-Reported Outcomes
#22
of 26 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,009,818 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 503 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.8. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 503,575 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 17th percentile – i.e., 17% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 26 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.