↓ Skip to main content

An overview of topic modeling and its current applications in bioinformatics

Overview of attention for article published in SpringerPlus, September 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (91st percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (93rd percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
2 blogs
twitter
7 X users
wikipedia
2 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
258 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
524 Mendeley
Title
An overview of topic modeling and its current applications in bioinformatics
Published in
SpringerPlus, September 2016
DOI 10.1186/s40064-016-3252-8
Pubmed ID
Authors

Lin Liu, Lin Tang, Wen Dong, Shaowen Yao, Wei Zhou

Abstract

With the rapid accumulation of biological datasets, machine learning methods designed to automate data analysis are urgently needed. In recent years, so-called topic models that originated from the field of natural language processing have been receiving much attention in bioinformatics because of their interpretability. Our aim was to review the application and development of topic models for bioinformatics. This paper starts with the description of a topic model, with a focus on the understanding of topic modeling. A general outline is provided on how to build an application in a topic model and how to develop a topic model. Meanwhile, the literature on application of topic models to biological data was searched and analyzed in depth. According to the types of models and the analogy between the concept of document-topic-word and a biological object (as well as the tasks of a topic model), we categorized the related studies and provided an outlook on the use of topic models for the development of bioinformatics applications. Topic modeling is a useful method (in contrast to the traditional means of data reduction in bioinformatics) and enhances researchers' ability to interpret biological information. Nevertheless, due to the lack of topic models optimized for specific biological data, the studies on topic modeling in biological data still have a long and challenging road ahead. We believe that topic models are a promising method for various applications in bioinformatics research.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 7 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 524 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Germany 1 <1%
Unknown 523 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 90 17%
Student > Master 74 14%
Researcher 57 11%
Student > Bachelor 46 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 25 5%
Other 76 15%
Unknown 156 30%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Computer Science 155 30%
Engineering 36 7%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 31 6%
Social Sciences 23 4%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 20 4%
Other 88 17%
Unknown 171 33%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 21. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 September 2021.
All research outputs
#1,507,828
of 22,889,074 outputs
Outputs from SpringerPlus
#74
of 1,850 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#28,747
of 320,232 outputs
Outputs of similar age from SpringerPlus
#12
of 172 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,889,074 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 93rd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,850 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.7. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 320,232 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 172 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.