| Title |
Comprehensive analysis of Twitter usage during a major medical conference held virtually versus in-person
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Insights into Imaging, January 2022
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s13244-021-01140-0 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Nedim Christoph Beste, Xue Davis, Roman Kloeckner, Erkan Celik, Michael Korenkov, David Maintz, Thomas Dratsch, Daniel Pinto dos Santos |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 11 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Italy | 2 | 18% |
| Austria | 2 | 18% |
| United States | 2 | 18% |
| France | 1 | 9% |
| Chile | 1 | 9% |
| Germany | 1 | 9% |
| Unknown | 2 | 18% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 4 | 36% |
| Scientists | 3 | 27% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 3 | 27% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 9% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 23 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 23 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Doctoral Student | 5 | 22% |
| Student > Bachelor | 2 | 9% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 2 | 9% |
| Other | 1 | 4% |
| Student > Master | 1 | 4% |
| Other | 3 | 13% |
| Unknown | 9 | 39% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Computer Science | 3 | 13% |
| Social Sciences | 3 | 13% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 2 | 9% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 2 | 9% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 1 | 4% |
| Other | 3 | 13% |
| Unknown | 9 | 39% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 June 2023.
All research outputs
#5,972,994
of 24,217,893 outputs
Outputs from Insights into Imaging
#343
of 1,072 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#127,307
of 505,560 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Insights into Imaging
#14
of 41 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,217,893 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 75th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,072 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.2. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 67% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 505,560 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 74% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 41 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 65% of its contemporaries.