| Title |
Martian moons exploration MMX: sample return mission to Phobos elucidating formation processes of habitable planets
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Earth, Planets and Space, January 2022
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s40623-021-01545-7 |
| Authors |
Kiyoshi Kuramoto, Yasuhiro Kawakatsu, Masaki Fujimoto, Akito Araya, Maria Antonietta Barucci, Hidenori Genda, Naru Hirata, Hitoshi Ikeda, Takeshi Imamura, Jörn Helbert, Shingo Kameda, Masanori Kobayashi, Hiroki Kusano, David J. Lawrence, Koji Matsumoto, Patrick Michel, Hideaki Miyamoto, Tomokatsu Morota, Hiromu Nakagawa, Tomoki Nakamura, Kazunori Ogawa, Hisashi Otake, Masanobu Ozaki, Sara Russell, Sho Sasaki, Hirotaka Sawada, Hiroki Senshu, Shogo Tachibana, Naoki Terada, Stephan Ulamec, Tomohiro Usui, Koji Wada, Sei-ichiro Watanabe, Shoichiro Yokota |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 9 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 2 | 22% |
| Germany | 1 | 11% |
| Unknown | 6 | 67% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Scientists | 4 | 44% |
| Members of the public | 3 | 33% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 2 | 22% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 28 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 28 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 6 | 21% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 5 | 18% |
| Professor | 2 | 7% |
| Student > Master | 2 | 7% |
| Unspecified | 1 | 4% |
| Other | 1 | 4% |
| Unknown | 11 | 39% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Earth and Planetary Sciences | 7 | 25% |
| Physics and Astronomy | 4 | 14% |
| Engineering | 2 | 7% |
| Unspecified | 1 | 4% |
| Unknown | 14 | 50% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 314. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 January 2024.
All research outputs
#108,311
of 25,392,582 outputs
Outputs from Earth, Planets and Space
#2
of 1,472 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#3,590
of 515,638 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Earth, Planets and Space
#1
of 64 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,392,582 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,472 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.9. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 515,638 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 64 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.