Title |
Accommodating Mixed-Severity Fire to Restore and Maintain Ecosystem Integrity with a Focus on the Sierra Nevada of California, USA
|
---|---|
Published in |
Fire Ecology, August 2017
|
DOI | 10.4996/fireecology.130248173 |
Authors |
Dominick A. DellaSala, Richard L. Hutto, Chad T. Hanson, Monica L. Bond, Timothy Ingalsbee, Dennis Odion, William L. Baker |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 52 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 52 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Researcher | 16 | 31% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 7 | 13% |
Student > Bachelor | 6 | 12% |
Student > Master | 5 | 10% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 1 | 2% |
Other | 4 | 8% |
Unknown | 13 | 25% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Environmental Science | 18 | 35% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 10 | 19% |
Medicine and Dentistry | 2 | 4% |
Economics, Econometrics and Finance | 2 | 4% |
Unspecified | 1 | 2% |
Other | 2 | 4% |
Unknown | 17 | 33% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 19. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 25 January 2022.
All research outputs
#1,636,939
of 22,986,950 outputs
Outputs from Fire Ecology
#35
of 187 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#34,639
of 317,432 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Fire Ecology
#2
of 3 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,986,950 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 92nd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 187 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.9. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 317,432 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 3 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.