↓ Skip to main content

Duration of invasive mechanical ventilation prior to extracorporeal membrane oxygenation is not associated with survival in acute respiratory distress syndrome caused by coronavirus disease 2019

Overview of attention for article published in Annals of Intensive Care, January 2022
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (94th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (81st percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
60 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
27 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
57 Mendeley
Title
Duration of invasive mechanical ventilation prior to extracorporeal membrane oxygenation is not associated with survival in acute respiratory distress syndrome caused by coronavirus disease 2019
Published in
Annals of Intensive Care, January 2022
DOI 10.1186/s13613-022-00980-3
Pubmed ID
Authors

Martina Hermann, Daniel Laxar, Christoph Krall, Christina Hafner, Oliver Herzog, Oliver Kimberger, Sebastian Koenig, Felix Kraft, Mathias Maleczek, Klaus Markstaller, Oliver Robak, Bernhard Rössler, Eva Schaden, Peter Schellongowski, Mathias Schneeweiss-Gleixner, Thomas Staudinger, Roman Ullrich, Marion Wiegele, Harald Willschke, Christian Zauner, Alexander Hermann

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 60 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 57 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 57 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 7 12%
Researcher 6 11%
Student > Ph. D. Student 6 11%
Student > Master 5 9%
Professor > Associate Professor 3 5%
Other 10 18%
Unknown 20 35%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 19 33%
Nursing and Health Professions 5 9%
Engineering 3 5%
Neuroscience 2 4%
Social Sciences 2 4%
Other 4 7%
Unknown 22 39%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 34. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 January 2022.
All research outputs
#1,051,534
of 23,577,654 outputs
Outputs from Annals of Intensive Care
#115
of 1,074 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#27,109
of 516,376 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Annals of Intensive Care
#7
of 37 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,577,654 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,074 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 17.2. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 516,376 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 37 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its contemporaries.