↓ Skip to main content

HGM2008 new technologies: genome sequencing to molecular imaging symposium abstracts

Overview of attention for article published in The HUGO Journal, May 2009
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Readers on

mendeley
2 Mendeley
Title
HGM2008 new technologies: genome sequencing to molecular imaging symposium abstracts
Published in
The HUGO Journal, May 2009
DOI 10.1007/s11568-009-9110-9
Pubmed ID
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 2 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 2 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Professor 2 100%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 50%
Unknown 1 50%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 June 2020.
All research outputs
#8,534,976
of 25,374,647 outputs
Outputs from The HUGO Journal
#14
of 31 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#43,141
of 125,266 outputs
Outputs of similar age from The HUGO Journal
#2
of 2 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,647 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 31 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.9. This one scored the same or higher as 17 of them.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 125,266 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 17th percentile – i.e., 17% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 2 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.