Title |
A giant limulid trackway (Kouphichnium lithographicum) from the lithographic limestones of Cerin (Late Kimmeridgian, France): ethological and environmental implications
|
---|---|
Published in |
Swiss Journal of Geosciences, October 2010
|
DOI | 10.1007/s00015-010-0032-2 |
Authors |
Christian Gaillard |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 19 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United States | 1 | 5% |
Bangladesh | 1 | 5% |
France | 1 | 5% |
Unknown | 16 | 84% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Master | 5 | 26% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 3 | 16% |
Student > Bachelor | 3 | 16% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 3 | 16% |
Professor | 2 | 11% |
Other | 2 | 11% |
Unknown | 1 | 5% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Earth and Planetary Sciences | 11 | 58% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 3 | 16% |
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 1 | 5% |
Computer Science | 1 | 5% |
Unknown | 3 | 16% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 9. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 August 2022.
All research outputs
#4,056,423
of 24,217,893 outputs
Outputs from Swiss Journal of Geosciences
#23
of 177 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#17,471
of 102,818 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Swiss Journal of Geosciences
#2
of 6 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,217,893 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 83rd percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 177 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.1. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 102,818 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 6 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 4 of them.